Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Feb. 13, 2012

Consumers to Starbucks: Remove Forced Arbitration Language From Gift Cards

More Than 15,000 People Petition Coffee Giant to Stop Limiting Their Rights

SEATTLE – More than 15,000 people called on the Starbucks Coffee Corp. in a petition delivered Friday to remove from its prepaid cards’ terms of service a forced arbitration clause and class-action ban that unfairly restricts its customers’ legal rights. The petition, circulated by Public Citizen, follows a letter that the organization, along with three other public interest groups, sent to the coffee giant in December with the same request: stop limiting consumers’ access to the courts.

Clauses in consumer contracts requiring that disputes be settled by forced arbitration have mushroomed in the past decade. These clauses shield corporations from accountability for wrongdoing. In forced arbitration, there is no impartial judge or jury to settle disputes, but rather a secretive proceeding run by arbitrators who rely on their corporate customers for repeat business.

“Forced arbitration and class bans eviscerate consumers’ rights,” said Christine Hines, consumer and civil justice counsel with Public Citizen. “Starbucks’ decision to use them is inconsistent with the company’s claim to be a leader in corporate social responsibility. Now, the people have spoken and they want their rights back.”

“Starbucks’ lead paralegal, to whom we delivered the petition, warned us that this would be a difficult fight to win and that we’d have to really make our voices heard to get above the cacophony of noises and complaints they receive,” said Deborah Lapidus, a Public Citizen activist who delivered the petition. “However, he assured us that having 15,000 signatures meets the bar for the petitions to make it to the general counsel’s desk and he said that the CEO would end up hearing about it too. Overall, Starbucks’ staff was polite, listened and took our concerns seriously.”

To see photos of the petition delivery, visit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/publiccitizen/sets/72157629303942459.


Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.  

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.