» Government Ethics and Lobbying Reform

» Money in Politics

» Open Government

» Stealth PACs

» Public Protections

Sign Up

To receive regular updates on our campaigns for government accountability. 

Recent Reports

February 20, 2017 - For-Profit President
February 16, 2017 - The Devil in the Details
January 5, 2017 - Jeff Sessions as Alabama Attorney General
November 16, 2016 - The People Shaping the Trump Administration
Sept. 15, 2016 - The Company They Keep
September 14, 2016 - The Historic Campaign for Corporate Political Spending Disclosure

McCutcheon v. FEC Strikes Another Blow to Democracy

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: as Damaging as Citizens United

On Oct. 8, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, in which GOP donor Shaun McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee challenged limits on the cumulative total of contributions a person may make to candidates, political parties and political action committees.

On April 2, 2014, the court struck a huge blow to democracy by striking down aggregate contribution limits. Read our statement.

Read our fact sheet explaining the implications of McCutcheon.

Public Citizen also worked with allies to mobilize activists around the country to hold rallies, protests and other events on the day the McCutcheon ruling was handed down. The events range from press conferences and rallies to petition drives, to be held in cities including Baltimore, Md.; Chicago, Ill.; Denver, Colo.; Grand Rapids, Mich.; Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, Calif.; New York, N.Y.; San Diego, Calif.; Seattle, Wash.; and Washington, D.C. Learn about the events.

Meet some of the activists.

As in Citizens United, we were part of the legal team representing lawmakers who filed an amicus brief in McCutcheon. In the brief, we argued that striking down the aggregate contribution limits would lead to solicitations for candidates of hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars, creating the opportunity for transactions exchanging contributions for anticipated political favors from officeholders. The Supreme Court’s decisions have never applied strict First Amendment scrutiny to campaign contribution limitations, and the court has upheld every federal contribution limit it has ever reviewed, including aggregate limits, as a constitutional means of preventing corruption or its appearance.

    Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

    Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


    You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

    Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

    Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.