LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and the Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

Additional Resources

About Us
Case List
Recent News Alerts
Recent Publications


SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 

Electronic Records

Scheduling Electronic Records

Public Citizen has petitioned the Archivist to amend government rules on electronic records to prevent the loss of historically valuable government records.

Archivist John W. Carlin responded to the petition in a letter which states that NARA will retain GRS 20 and will not take action to propose alternatives until sometime after FY 2000. The letter states that NARA will consider Public Citizen's other proposals, but may not issue an advanced notice of proposed rule making for the public to comment on those proposals for twelve months.

In response to Public Citizens petition, NARA issued a request for comment to be submitted by January 8, 2002.

These are Public Citizen's comments on the Archivist's decision to hire a contractor to study on how federal agencies use records and how the government's procedures for identifying records to be destroyed could be improved. The study was contracted in September 2000 and the contractors report (as described above) was released in December 2001.

In 1996, Public Citizen and other organizations brought a court challenge to General Records Schedule 20, which authorizes federal agencies to routinely destroy electronic mail and word processing records.


Electronic Records Work Group

 

In 1998, an inter-agency working group recommended changes to the government's practices for managing electronic records in Electronic Records Work Group Report to the Archivist (September 14, 1998). This document contains Public Citizen's comments on the draft recommendations.


Preservation of Electronic Mail

 

Court challenge to the government's plans to dispose of electronic mail and word processing records of Reagan, Bush and Clinton White House officials at the end of each administration.




 

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.