» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing


Read our outrages

If you're not outraged,
you're not paying attention!

Read what Public Citizen has to say about the biggest blunders and outrageous offenses in the world of public health, published monthly in Health Letter.

Atomic (Nuclear) Power

March 2011

Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D.

It should not have taken the sad, tragic recent events in Japan to increase serious worldwide concerns about the multiply awful consequences of nuclear power, an allegedly "clean" form of energy. In addition to the well-known consequences of Three Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986, there has been unremitting evidence for decades of routine radiation exposure of workers in many of these atomic power plants, especially older ones.

Aside from the dire health consequences to workers and to those living near these plants (or downwind from these plants in the case of a release), the true economic costs of atomic power have been maliciously understated by ignoring or underplaying, for example, the costs of decommissioning plants when they have aged enough to become more dangerous or the cost per kilowatt hour compared to other energy sources.

It is long overdue to say "no" to the licensing of any new atomic power reactors and to the relicensing of existing reactors. At a recent White House briefing, however, Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman clearly stated that nuclear power remains part of the U.S. energy policy. "Seventy percent of the carbon-free electricity in this country comes from nuclear power," Poneman said. "So we do see nuclear power as continuing to play an important role in building a low-carbon future, but be assured that we will take the safety aspect of that as of our paramount concern." In addition to being extremely misleading - since only 20 percent of U.S. energy is from atomic power - this sounds like the kind of assurances the Japanese atomic power industry used to give.

In the wake of this still-unfolding disaster, Tyson Slocum, Director of Public Citizen's Energy Program, called on the government to do the following:

  1. Immediately stop activity relating to relicensing aging U.S. reactors;
  2. Halt all activity geared toward building new reactors; and
  3. End federal subsidies - such as loan guarantees - for commercial nuclear power, which total $500 billion to date.

Instead, the U.S. should focus on developing wind power and assisting families in the installation of rooftop solar systems.

To sign the petition, visit:

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.